U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. (Image by Mark Thomas from Pixabay)
(FOX NEWS) – A whistleblower who claims that he was tipped off to the decision in a major Supreme Court case before it was published in 2014 admitted Thursday that an incident he described in his new book "may not have" actually happened — then he was played evidence proving it did not.
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing titled, "Undue Influence: Operation Higher Court and Politicking at SCOTUS," Rev. Robert Schenck faced questions from Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, about the circumstances surrounding a separate case involving his brother, Rev. Paul Schenck.
WND is now on Trump's Truth Social! Follow us @WNDNews
"With a single rap of the gavel, Chief Justice William Rehnquist announced: 'We'll hear argument first this morning in Number 95-1056, Reverend Paul Schenck and Dwight Saunders versus Pro-Choice Network of Western New York,'" Robert Schenck wrote in his book, as Jordan showed via placards bearing the text. "Paul and I winked at each other, knowing we had made history with 'Reverend' in his name."
The post SCOTUS whistleblower admits incident in his book 'possibly' did not happen, then Jordan proves it didn't appeared first on WND.
