Court case ends when state decides it can’t regulate ‘thoughts directed toward God’

  • by:
  • Source: Bob Unruh
  • 07/22/2023
(Unsplash)

(Unsplash)

In a conclusion that would seem obvious to those of faith, the government in the United Kingdom has decided to end a case against a man who prayed in a "restricted" zone around an abortion business because officials decided they cannot regulate "thoughts directed toward God."

Officials with the United Kingdom branch of ADF revealed that the case against Adam Smith-Connor has ended.

He was cleared months after getting fined for "silent prayer in an abortion facility censorship zone or 'buffer zone,'" the organization reported.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND's Email News Alerts!

"The Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole (BCP) Council, tasked with enforcing Smith-Connor’s penalty, refrained from pursuing prosecution within the statutory time-limit," the ADF reported. "This followed the police’s assessment that praying silently was not an offense in England and submissions by Adam’s legal team that the state had no power to restrict thoughts directed toward God."

Smith-Connor, in a statement released by his legal team, explained, "Nobody should be criminalized for what they believe – especially not when they express that belief silently, in the privacy of their own minds. I’m glad that, in my case, common-sense policing won the day.

"However," he continued, "it’s not right that I had to wait anxiously for a full six months for the authorities to determine my fate. The process, in essence, became my punishment."

It was last Nov. 24 when "Community Safety-Accredited Officers” employed by BCP Council, were tasked with patrolling the abortion facility zone on Ophir Road and repeatedly grilled Smith-Connor regarding the content of his thoughts.

WND is now on Trump's Truth Social! Follow us @WNDNews

"He was interrogated as to 'the nature of his prayer' with the view that he was in breach of local 'buffer zone' rules," the report said.

Smith-Connor, who had lost a son to abortion 22 years earlier, said he was "praying for [his] son, who is deceased."

He continued, "It’s unthinkable that I was issued a penalty simply for praying about my own experience of abortion – having paid for my ex-girlfriend to have one – and my son, Jacob, whom I lost. The decision I made all those years ago now grieves me deeply. It isn’t for the authorities to determine the contents of my thoughts on this matter, on a public street. I served in Afghanistan to defend democratic freedom – and yet, we see this encroachment on fundamental rights on the streets of Britain today."

Police officers, when they got involved, actually pointed out that Smith-Connor was allowed to pray silently in a public place.

Despite that ruling, those "Community Safety" officers fined him, and threatened criminal charges when he refused to pay the fine over the "thought-crime."

"But for the fact that he happened to be praying in his mind about abortion, Adam would not have been asked to leave," explained Jeremiah Igunnubole, legal counsel for ADF UK.

Under the "buffer zone" law enforced at that location, "local authorities" declared it was criminal for engaging in “an act” or even “attempted act” of “approval/disapproval, with respect to issues related to abortion services, by any means."

It specifically outlaws "prayer."

The Christian Institute noted that just a few months ago, "pro-life campaigners arrested for praying silently near an abortion center in Birmingham were fully vindicated."

In that case, a magistrate dismissed cases brought against Isabel Vaughan-Spruce and Roman Catholic priest Sean Gough, after the Crown Prosecution Service offered no evidence of criminal activity and dropped the charges.

IMPORTANT NOTE: To their horror, America’s ruling elites failed to knock out Donald Trump during his four years as president via the fabricated Trump-Russia collusion scandal – conceived and funded by the Hillary Clinton campaign, as the Durham report proves – or through two circus-like impeachment trials. Later came “January 6,” a demonstration-turned-riot by Trump supporters who passionately believed, with good reason, that the recent election – and therefore their country – had just been stolen from them. Members of Congress now want to constitutionally bar Trump from again seeking public office for having instigated “an armed insurrection” (no protester was armed) against America.

Then in March, Trump was indicted in New York on 34 counts of falsifying business records, and in June, still more indictments were filed against Trump – 37 federal criminal charges related to his handling of classified documents. Honest legal experts not in league with the Biden administration openly classify these indictments as somewhere between frivolous and idiotic, not to mention grotesquely politically motivated.

The Deep State’s never-ending persecution of Donald Trump, as well as the incredible back story of the totalitarian agenda Trump’s persecutors are attempting to implement in America and why Trump represents a mortal threat to their nefarious designs – is the focus of the blockbuster July issue of WND’s critically acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine, titled “THE PERSECUTION OF DONALD TRUMP: Why the ruling elites loathe – and fear – the 45th president.”

WHISTLEBLOWER is available in both the popular print edition and a state-of-the-art digital version, either single issues or discounted annual subscriptions.

For 25 years, WND has boldly brought you the news that really matters. If you appreciate our Christian journalists and their uniquely truthful reporting and analysis, please help us by becoming a WND Insider!

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@wndnewscenter.org.

SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!

The post Court case ends when state decides it can't regulate 'thoughts directed toward God' appeared first on WND.

by is licensed under